Which coins each cashier actually lists

Eleven tickers, printed in the order the cashier shows them: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC, DOGE. Four of the eleven are the obvious majors, two are dollar stablecoins, and the rest are the chains that have become standard on crypto-first casinos over the last few years.

One entry on that list is unusual. SUI appears on Roobet's cashier and on none of the twenty-two alternative lists we have read. If SUI is the coin you actually hold, that is a genuine reason to stay where you are, and no amount of catalogue depth elsewhere changes it.

Roobet is not a crypto-only cashier. Clause 9.7 of its terms applies a 1% deposit fee to all successful fiat deposits, and clause 10.8 sets a 2% fee on fiat withdrawals from the tenth in any rolling thirty-day period. A fiat fee schedule only exists where fiat deposits exist. What the terms do not do is name the fiat rails themselves, so this page does not name them either.

Twenty-two of the forty-one alternatives publish a cashier list we have read. The spread between them is enormous: Cloudbet prints forty tickers, KatsuBet prints one. Length is not quality, and the third column below matters more than the second, because it counts how much of Roobet's own list a cashier reproduces.

Two rows are worth reading twice. LTC Casino prints ten tickers, all ten of them on Roobet's list, and nothing else, which makes it the closest thing to a like-for-like cashier in the set. Cloudbet prints forty, but only nine of Roobet's eleven, because it lists neither SUI nor TRX. A longer list is not automatically a superset.

The middle of the table makes the same point more sharply. Rocketpot and Wolf.bet both print thirteen tickers, and they are not the same thirteen. Rocketpot covers eight of Roobet's eleven, missing USDT, SOL and SUI, and adds five coins of its own. Wolf.bet covers seven, missing SUI, BNB, TRX and LTC, and adds six. Two cashiers of identical length, and a litecoin balance is welcome at one and not at the other.

The same asymmetry runs the other way for the shorter lists. Rainbet publishes nine tickers, all nine on Roobet's list, missing only SUI and DOGE. Flush publishes nine too, of which eight are Roobet's, and adds one. For a reader carrying a single major coin, either is a straight swap; for a reader with a mixed balance, the difference is a coin at a time.

These nineteen brands are in the comparison, and not one of them is missing from the table above because it takes nothing. They are missing because the page that would settle it has not been read, and the library records the field as empty rather than guessing.

Several of them are among the largest names in the set, which is exactly why the gap is worth printing rather than hiding. A reader choosing between Stake and Wolf.bet on the strength of a coin list should know that we hold one of those two lists and not the other.

• BC.Game, Bitsler, Bitcasino.io, Sportsbet.io and Livecasino.io
• Stake, Primedice, BetFury, Fairspin and Empire.io
• Thunderpick, FortuneJack, Weiss, Betcoin.ag and Chipstars
• BetPlays, BitStarz, JacksClub and Mirax

Read the other way round, the same data answers a more useful question: if you leave Roobet holding a particular coin, how many of the alternatives can take it? The denominator here is twenty-two, the cashiers whose lists we have read, and not forty-one.

Bitcoin and ether are nearly universal. Tether and litecoin are close behind. The two dollar stablecoins split, with USDT on eighteen lists and USDC on eleven, which matters because they are not interchangeable at the cashier even though they are treated as interchangeable in conversation. And SUI, the eleventh entry, appears on none of them.

For a reader who keeps a balance in dollars rather than in a volatile asset, the stablecoin row is the one that decides the shortlist. Roobet lists two, USDT and USDC. Nineteen of the twenty-two read cashiers list at least one stablecoin; three list none at all.

Cloudbet is the outlier, with six separate stablecoin entries: USDT, USDC, USDP, DAI, USDE and SUSDE, and separately PAXG, which is backed by gold rather than by dollars. Rocketpot is the only cashier in the set that splits tether into two tickers by network, printing USDTE and USDTT as separate entries rather than one. That is a formatting decision by the operator, but it is also a useful signal: a cashier that distinguishes networks in its own list is a cashier that expects you to care which network you send on.

The three read cashiers with no stablecoin on the list are Bitdreams, KatsuBet and Playbet.io. KatsuBet's list is a single ticker, BTC.

Beyond the eleven Roobet prints, thirty-nine further tickers appear somewhere across the twenty-two read lists. Most of them appear once. Bitcoin cash is the most common coin Roobet does not list, on ten cashiers, followed by cardano on nine, then TON and DAI on four each.

Three of the read cashiers carry a coin with meaningful privacy properties. Monero appears on DuckDice and Rakebit. Dash appears on DuckDice and Cloudbet. Zcash appears on Rakebit and Cloudbet. That is three brands out of forty-one, and it is the sort of fact that is easy to assume and hard to find.

Three cashiers list a token of the operator's own. Shuffle lists SHFL, TrustDice lists TXT, and Sportbet.one lists SBET alongside VAULTA. A house token in the deposit list is not a deposit rail in the ordinary sense, since it is a coin you will usually have obtained on the site itself, and it inflates a coin count without widening the set of ways money gets in.

Cloudbet's forty entries are a category of their own, running from the majors through HBAR, ALGO, XLM, AVAX and STETH to a set of memecoins. Counted as a list it is the longest in the comparison by a factor of two. Counted as coverage of Roobet's own eleven, it is ninth out of twenty-two.

Five of the twenty-two read cashiers publish five tickers or fewer, and they are worth separating from the rest because they are a different proposition entirely. KatsuBet lists one: BTC. Bspin lists three: BTC, ETH and USDT. Playbet.io lists three as well, but a different three: BTC, SOL and ETH, with no stablecoin at all. Bitdreams and CoinPoker each list five.

A short list is not automatically a worse one. Every ticker on all five of those cashiers is also on Roobet's, so none of them asks you to acquire a coin you do not already hold. What a short list does is remove the choice of network and of asset: a Playbet.io balance has to arrive as bitcoin, solana or ether, and a KatsuBet balance has to arrive as bitcoin.

That is a real constraint rather than a technicality, because the coin you send in is usually the coin you take out. A cashier that lists one ticker is a cashier where the exchange rate risk between deposit and withdrawal is entirely yours and entirely in one asset.

A ticker is not a network. USDT on Ethereum, on Tron and on Solana are three different transfers with three different fees, and only Rocketpot's list distinguishes them at all. Everyone else prints one ticker, and the network you are expected to send on is settled inside the cashier rather than in anything we have read.

A coin list also carries no minimum, no maximum and no fee. The only deposit fee figure anywhere in this comparison is Roobet's own: clause 9.7, a flat 1% on successful fiat deposits. We hold no fee field at all for the forty-one alternatives, so nothing here should be read as saying their deposits are free, only that we have not read a document that prices them.

And a coin list says nothing about getting money out. A withdrawal cap is published by eight of the forty-one and by none of the rest, Roobet included, whose terms name two fees and no maximum. The deposit and withdrawal terms are set out clause by clause on their own page. Where an operator will and will not open an account is a matter for its licence record, which has a page of its own too.