Which studios each catalogue is built from
Roobet publishes sixty-four studios. Twenty-two alternatives publish a list too, from thirteen names to a hundred and twenty. Studio by studio, here is the overlap.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
The number a casino puts on its home page is a game count. The number worth comparing is a studio count, because a studio is a supplier under contract and a game count is a number that changes when someone runs an import script. Studio lists are also published as flat lists of names, which makes them checkable in a way a game count never is.
Roobet's own list runs to sixty-four entries. Of the forty-one alternatives in this comparison, twenty-two publish a list we have read, and those run from CryptoLeo's thirteen to Bitcasino.io's hundred and twenty. For the other nineteen we have not read a list, and this page does not fill that in with a guess. Which of those studios also carry games like Roobet's is worked out on its own page, and the Roobet casino alternatives ranking uses the same lists.
Two things follow from reading the lists side by side rather than counting them. First, a longer list is not a superset: the deepest catalogue in the set still misses studios Roobet carries. Second, the overlap is much higher than the raw counts suggest, because roughly twenty studios turn up on almost every list in the industry.
What Roobet's list contains
Sixty-four entries, read on 2026-08-28. It carries the names that anchor almost every crypto casino catalogue: Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Nolimit City, NetEnt, Play'n GO, Push Gaming, Big Time Gaming, Thunderkick, Quickspin, Relax, Red Tiger, Yggdrasil, Wazdan, Novomatic, Habanero, ELK Studios and Blueprint Gaming.
It also carries a second tier that is much less common. Roobet lists Bullshark Games, Clawbuster, Backseat Gaming, Shady Lady, Penguin King, Sneaky Slots, DEGEN Studios, G.Games, Gamesinc, NowNow Gaming, MrSlotty, Amigo Gaming, Just Slots and Print Studios. Several of these appear on only a handful of the other twenty-two lists, and two appear on none of them at all: Eurasian Gaming Slots and MLive.
A few of the sixty-four are the same supplier listed twice, once for slots and once for its live tables. OneTouch and OneTouch Live are both on the list, as are Microgaming and Games Global, which are related names in the same lineage. That is how Roobet prints it, so that is how it is counted here: sixty-four entries, not sixty-four independent companies.
How many studios each alternative lists
Eight of the twenty-two read lists are longer than Roobet's sixty-four. The top three are very substantially longer: Bitcasino.io at a hundred and twenty, Fairspin at a hundred and fourteen, Sportsbet.io at a hundred and ten.
The third column is the one that answers the practical question. It counts how many of Roobet's own sixty-four entries the brand also names, matching across spelling variants, so Evolution Gaming counts as Evolution and NoLimit City counts as Nolimit City. Bitcasino.io reproduces forty-nine of them, the most in the set. Rainbet is the interesting row: thirty-three studios, twenty-six of which are on Roobet's list, so only seven of its names are new. In composition it is the nearest match to Roobet in the comparison.
| Brand | Studios listed | Also on Roobet's list | Not on Roobet's list |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcasino.io | 120 | 49 | 70 |
| Fairspin | 114 | 39 | 75 |
| Sportsbet.io | 110 | 44 | 66 |
| Flush | 85 | 30 | 53 |
| Wild.io | 80 | 37 | 40 |
| Empire.io | 79 | 40 | 39 |
| Playbet.io | 79 | 35 | 43 |
| BetFury | 73 | 37 | 36 |
| BitStarz | 62 | 25 | 36 |
| Livecasino.io | 50 | 24 | 25 |
| Betcoin.ag | 47 | 21 | 25 |
| Windice | 44 | 19 | 25 |
| TrustDice | 43 | 24 | 19 |
| LTC Casino | 42 | 24 | 17 |
| FortuneJack | 42 | 26 | 16 |
| Bitsler | 41 | 25 | 16 |
| Thunderpick | 40 | 20 | 20 |
| Rainbet | 33 | 26 | 7 |
| Wolf.bet | 32 | 17 | 15 |
| DuckDice | 19 | 12 | 7 |
| BetPlays | 19 | 8 | 11 |
| CryptoLeo | 13 | 5 | 8 |
Roobet's own list has sixty-four entries. Overlap is matched across spelling variants, so Evolution Gaming, Evolution and Evo count as one studio and PGSoft counts as PG Soft. The nineteen brands absent from this table have no studio list we have read.
The studios almost everyone carries
Across the twenty-two read lists, a small core turns up nearly everywhere. Hacksaw Gaming is on twenty-one of them, Evolution on twenty, Pragmatic Play and Endorphina on nineteen each, Nolimit City on eighteen.
That core is the reason catalogue depth is a weaker differentiator than it looks. If the games you actually open are made by Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw, Nolimit City or Evolution, you will find them on almost any brand in this set, and the difference between a forty-studio catalogue and a hundred-and-twenty-studio catalogue is a difference in the tail rather than in what you play.
Four studios in the table below are on fifteen or more alternative lists and are not on Roobet's. GameArt and PG Soft are on seventeen each, Platipus on sixteen. If you have been playing PG Soft titles elsewhere, Roobet's list is the one that does not have them.
| Studio | On Roobet's list | Alternatives listing it |
|---|---|---|
| Hacksaw Gaming | Yes | 21 of 22 |
| Evolution | Yes | 20 of 22 |
| Pragmatic Play | Yes | 19 of 22 |
| Endorphina | Yes | 19 of 22 |
| Nolimit City | Yes | 18 of 22 |
| BGaming | Yes | 17 of 22 |
| Booming Games | Yes | 17 of 22 |
| Betsoft | Yes | 17 of 22 |
| PG Soft | No | 17 of 22 |
| GameArt | No | 17 of 22 |
| NetEnt | Yes | 16 of 22 |
| Platipus | No | 16 of 22 |
| Play'n GO | Yes | 15 of 22 |
| Relax Gaming | Yes | 15 of 22 |
| Fugaso | No | 14 of 22 |
| Spinomenal | Yes | 14 of 22 |
| AvatarUX | Yes | 14 of 22 |
| Spribe | No | 13 of 22 |
| OnlyPlay | No | 13 of 22 |
| Push Gaming | Yes | 13 of 22 |
| Thunderkick | Yes | 13 of 22 |
| Quickspin | Yes | 13 of 22 |
| Belatra | No | 12 of 22 |
| Yggdrasil | Yes | 12 of 22 |
| Red Tiger | Yes | 12 of 22 |
| Big Time Gaming | Yes | 12 of 22 |
| Ezugi | No | 11 of 22 |
| Playtech | No | 7 of 22 |
Counted across the twenty-two alternatives whose studio list we have read. Spelling variants are matched, so Evolution Gaming and Evo count as Evolution.
The middle of the table, where the choice is real
Eight brands in the comparison publish a list of between forty and fifty studios: Livecasino.io at fifty, Betcoin.ag at forty-seven, Windice at forty-four, TrustDice at forty-three, LTC Casino and FortuneJack at forty-two each, Bitsler at forty-one and Thunderpick at forty. That is a band roughly two-thirds the size of Roobet's list, and it is where most of the practical decisions in this set actually get made.
The overlap within that band varies more than the totals suggest. FortuneJack reproduces twenty-six of Roobet's sixty-four on a list of forty-two, and Bitsler twenty-five on a list of forty-one, so both are close cousins with roughly sixteen names of their own. Windice reproduces nineteen on a list of forty-four, which makes it a considerably less familiar catalogue at almost the same size, and Thunderpick twenty on forty.
Below that band the drop is steep rather than gradual. Wolf.bet publishes thirty-two, Rainbet thirty-three, then DuckDice and BetPlays nineteen each and CryptoLeo thirteen. CryptoLeo's thirteen include only five of Roobet's, which is the least overlap anywhere in the set: Endorphina, Evolution, Microgaming, Playson and Quickspin.
The studios Roobet does not carry at all
Eleven studios appear on ten or more of the twenty-two lists we have read and are absent from Roobet's sixty-four. Three of them are on more than fifteen: GameArt and PG Soft on seventeen each, Platipus on sixteen.
The rest of that group is Fugaso on fourteen, OnlyPlay and Spribe on thirteen each, Belatra and 3 Oaks on twelve, Ezugi on eleven, and Tom Horn and Fantasma on ten each. Two of those are worth singling out for what they do. Spribe supplies crash-style titles, and Ezugi is one of only two live-table suppliers with double-digit distribution across this set.
Reading that group against the frequency table also settles a common assumption. Roobet's list is not short, and it is not narrow at the top: it carries eight of the ten most widely distributed studios in the set. What it does not carry is the second rank of widely distributed suppliers, and that is where the difference between its catalogue and a hundred-name catalogue actually sits.
Playtech is the interesting absence in the other direction. It is one of the largest suppliers in the wider industry and it appears on only seven of the twenty-two lists here, and not on Roobet's: Bitsler, LTC Casino, Windice, BetFury, FortuneJack, TrustDice and BitStarz. Distribution in crypto-first catalogues does not track distribution elsewhere.
What Roobet has that the others mostly do not
Reading the comparison in reverse produces a short but real list. Of Roobet's sixty-four entries, two appear on none of the twenty-two alternative lists we have read: Eurasian Gaming Slots and MLive.
Another handful are close to it. DEGEN Studios appears only on Bitcasino.io. G.Games appears only on Thunderpick. Gamesinc appears only on FortuneJack. MrSlotty appears only on Windice. Sneaky Slots appears on Bitcasino.io and Wild.io. Amigo Gaming appears on Wild.io, BetFury and Bitsler. NowNow Gaming appears on Wild.io, Playbet.io and BitStarz.
None of that makes Roobet's catalogue larger. It makes it distinctive at the margins, which is a different claim and a smaller one, but it is the honest reading of the data and it is what a reader considering a move should weigh against the fifty-odd studios most of the alternatives add.
Live tables, and how they are counted
Live dealer supply concentrates harder than slot supply. Evolution is on twenty of the twenty-two read lists and on Roobet's. Ezugi, which Roobet does not list, is on eleven. Below that the field fragments quickly: Live Solutions on five, Live88 on five, Bombay Live on five, CreedRoomz on four, Vivo Gaming on four.
Several brands list a supplier's live arm as a separate entry, which inflates a raw count without adding a supplier. Pragmatic Play Live, Microgaming Live and OneTouch Live all appear as their own lines on one list or another. Where the overlap column in the first table would otherwise double-count them, they are folded into the parent studio.
The library also carries a product tag for live dealer games on thirty-six of the forty-one alternatives. That tag is a description of the product recorded in the library, not a quotation from a supplier list, and it is not evidence that any particular studio is behind the tables.
The nineteen brands with no studio list we have read
BC.Game, Rocketpot, Metaspins, Rakebit, Shuffle, Bspin, Cloudbet, Stake, Primedice, JacksClub, Nitrobetting, CoinPoker, Mirax, Sportbet.one, KatsuBet, Bitdreams, Wild Fortune, Weiss and Chipstars have no supplier list in the library.
That is nineteen of forty-one, and it includes two of the largest brands in the set. It is a gap in our reading and it is printed as one. Where the field is empty, this site does not rank a brand as though it had a small catalogue, and the scoring routine gives it no credit either way.
What a studio list does not settle
A studio list names suppliers, not titles. Two brands that both list Pragmatic Play may carry different subsets of its catalogue, because supply agreements are per-market and per-title and none of that is published in anything we have read.
It also says nothing about return-to-player settings, which some studios ship in several configurations and let operators choose between. No operator in this comparison publishes an RTP schedule in a document we have read, so no page on this site compares one.
And it says nothing about whether a game will load where you are. That question turns on an operator's licence record rather than on its supplier list, and it is set out on the licence page.
Questions people ask
- How many game providers does Roobet list?
Sixty-four entries, read on 2026-08-28. A few of them are the same supplier printed twice, once for slots and once for live tables, so sixty-four is a count of lines on the list rather than of independent companies.
- Which alternative has the deepest catalogue?
Bitcasino.io, with a hundred and twenty studios, ahead of Fairspin on a hundred and fourteen and Sportsbet.io on a hundred and ten. Eight of the twenty-two read lists are longer than Roobet's sixty-four.
- Which alternative is closest to Roobet's own catalogue?
Rainbet. It lists thirty-three studios, twenty-six of which are also on Roobet's list, so only seven names are new. Bitcasino.io reproduces the largest absolute number of Roobet's entries, forty-nine, but on a list nearly twice as long.
- Does Roobet have PG Soft?
Not on the list read on 2026-08-28. PG Soft appears on seventeen of the twenty-two alternative lists we have read, which makes it one of the most widely carried studios that Roobet does not name. GameArt and Platipus are in the same position.
- Which studios does Roobet have that the alternatives do not?
Two of Roobet's sixty-four appear on none of the twenty-two alternative lists we have read: Eurasian Gaming Slots and MLive. Several more appear on only one, including DEGEN Studios, G.Games, Gamesinc and MrSlotty.
- Why is a studio count better than a game count?
A studio is a supplier under contract and its name is published as a flat list you can check. A game count is a number an operator writes about itself, moves when a catalogue is re-imported, and nobody outside the operator can verify.
Alternatives to Roobet — Roobet publishes sixty-four studios. Twenty-two alternatives publish a list too, from thirteen names to a hundred and twenty. Studio by studio, here is the overlap.