Sites like Roobet, judged by what the cashier accepts

Taking each of Roobet's eleven coins in turn and counting how many of the twenty-two readable cashiers also list it produces a clean picture of which parts of Roobet's cashier are ordinary and which are not.

Ten of the eleven are ordinary. BTC is on every one of the twenty-two. ETH is on twenty-one. USDT is on eighteen and LTC on seventeen. The lower half of the list — DOGE, XRP, TRX, USDC, SOL and BNB — sits between eleven and thirteen, which is to say roughly half the field carries each one.

The eleventh is SUI, and it appears on none of the twenty-two. That is not a criticism of Roobet, which is entitled to support a chain nobody else in this set does. It is a warning for a specific reader: anyone whose deposits arrive in SUI is depending on an arrangement that, among the cashiers read here, exists at one operator.

Coverage is the more useful number than size. A cashier with forty coins that happens to miss two of Roobet's eleven is a worse match, for a reader who deposits the way they already deposit, than a cashier with ten coins that carries all of them.

By that measure two operators sit at the top and they arrive there from opposite directions. LTC Casino publishes ten coins, and all ten are on Roobet's list — a cashier that is a strict subset, missing only SUI and adding nothing. Wild.io publishes twelve, ten of them Roobet's, adding BCH and ADA. Sportbet.one also covers ten of the eleven, inside a list of nineteen.

Below them, Rainbet covers nine of eleven from a list of nine, Cloudbet covers nine from a list of forty, and Rakebit covers nine from fifteen. The bottom of the table is where the mismatch becomes practical: KatsuBet publishes one coin, BTC, and Bspin and Playbet.io publish three each. Those are not smaller versions of Roobet's cashier; they are different cashiers that happen to overlap at the top.

Going the other way — what a cashier carries that Roobet does not — separates the operators offering genuinely more choice from those offering a different eleven.

Cloudbet is in a category of its own. Its list of forty adds thirty-one coins Roobet does not carry, and the additions are not more of the same: stablecoins beyond USDT and USDC in USDP, DAI, USDe and sUSDe, a gold-backed token in PAXG, staked ether in stETH, and a substantial memecoin section. Sportbet.one adds nine, including its own SBET token and VAULTA. Rakebit adds six, among them XMR and ZEC.

Most of the rest add one or two, and the additions repeat: BCH appears on ten of the twenty-two cashiers and ADA on nine, which makes them the two obvious coins a reader might want that Roobet does not list. Everything else in the tail is close to single-operator. OP appears on Wolf.bet alone in this set. SHFL appears on Shuffle, which issues it. TXT appears on TrustDice.

The practical reading is that the top of the market is not competing on the standard coins at all — everybody has those — but on how far past them they are willing to go.

Nineteen of the forty-one alternatives have no coin list in the library. Several of them are among the largest names in the set, and several score well on other fields, so their absence here is not a judgement about them.

The nineteen are BC.Game, Bitsler, JacksClub, Bitcasino.io, Thunderpick, Sportsbet.io, Fairspin, Empire.io, Stake, Primedice, BetFury, FortuneJack, Mirax, Livecasino.io, BetPlays, BitStarz, Weiss, Betcoin.ag and Chipstars.

Every one of them accepts deposits; that is what they are. What is missing is a published, readable list of which coins, captured on a date. A reader who wants one of these operators specifically has to open its cashier and look, and the comparison on this page cannot do it for them.

It is worth noticing where this bites. Bitcasino.io, Sportsbet.io and Fairspin publish the three largest studio catalogues in the entire set and sit near the top of the ranking on paperwork, yet none of the three can appear in a cashier comparison. Documentation is uneven brand by brand as well as field by field.

Seven of the twenty-two readable cashiers are strict subsets of Roobet's eleven coins: every coin they list is already on Roobet, and none of them lists anything Roobet does not.

They are Rainbet at nine coins, LTC Casino at ten, CoinPoker at five, Bitdreams at five, Bspin at three, Playbet.io at three and KatsuBet at one. For a reader whose only question is where else their coin is accepted, these seven answer it and offer nothing beyond it.

The distinction matters most at the bottom of that list. KatsuBet publishes BTC and nothing else, so a Roobet player who deposits in USDT, SOL or XRP has no route in at all. Bspin lists BTC, ETH and USDT; Playbet.io lists BTC, SOL and ETH. Those are three-coin cashiers rather than reduced versions of an eleven-coin one, and the specific three matter more than the count.

At the other end of the same category, LTC Casino is the closest cashier match in the entire set: ten of Roobet's eleven, nothing else, missing only SUI. A player moving from Roobet to LTC Casino changes nothing about how they fund an account unless SUI is the coin they use.

Stablecoins deserve separating out, because they behave differently from the rest of a cashier: a reader using them is usually doing so to avoid holding a volatile balance, and which one an operator supports decides whether that is possible at all.

USDT is the standard, on eighteen of the twenty-two readable cashiers. USDC is on eleven, a little under half. After that the field thins fast. DAI appears on four — Cloudbet, Sportbet.one, Rakebit and Rocketpot. USDP, USDe and sUSDe appear on one cashier each, all three of them Cloudbet's, which is the only operator in the set carrying a stablecoin range wider than the two majors.

Rocketpot is a special case worth naming precisely because it looks like an error and is not. Its published list contains two separate USDT entries distinguished by chain, and it does not contain plain USDC. A cashier that splits one stablecoin across networks is telling the reader something useful — that the network matters at deposit time — and a comparison that flattened both entries into a single USDT row would erase it.

Roobet publishes USDT and USDC and no other stablecoin. That places it exactly at the market standard: everything most cashiers carry, and none of the wider range that one cashier in this set does.

One more detail belongs with this. A ticker is not a route. Cloudbet's list writes TRON where every other cashier in the set writes TRX, and Rocketpot splits USDT into two chain-specific entries. Both are the same underlying assets described at different levels of precision, and both are reproduced here as published rather than normalised, because normalising them would hide the one thing a depositor needs to get right — which network the transfer goes out on. Where a cashier is vague about that, the operator's own deposit screen is the only place to settle it.

A coin list is a strong piece of evidence with a narrow scope. It tells you what an operator says it will accept. It does not tell you the network fee, the confirmation count, the minimum deposit, or whether a withdrawal in the same coin is processed on the same chain — none of which was read for this page, and none of which should be inferred from the presence of a ticker.

It also says nothing about what happens after the deposit. Roobet's clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn, and its clauses 4.9 and 10.5 allow identity documents to be demanded at any point and refuse withdrawals until identity is fully verified. Those clauses apply to every coin on the list equally. A cashier that accepts your coin is the beginning of the transaction, not the end of it, and the verification clauses are where the Roobet alternatives in this set actually differ from one another.

There is one further boundary worth marking. A coin list says nothing about the ordinary-currency side of an account. Roobet's own cashier prints eleven coins and no fiat methods, yet its terms charge 1% on all successful fiat deposits at clause 9.7 and 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in any rolling thirty-day period at clause 10.8. A published cashier and a published fee schedule can describe two different sets of transactions at the same operator, and neither one completes the picture on its own.

Read alongside the deposit coins comparison and the withdrawal methods page, the cashier tells you which sites like Roobet you can fund without changing habits. On its own, it tells you only that.