BC.Game vs Roobet
BC.Game's licence record is checkable in a way Roobet's is not; on the cashier, the studio roster and the money clauses, Roobet is the one that has published something we can read.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
BC.Game against Roobet, side by side
| BC.Game | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | ALSI-202410011-FI1 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | Valid | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | Not verified | Not published |
| Coins | Not verified | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | Not verified | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
BC.Game is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
On the licence itself BC.Game comes out ahead. Its record carries an Anjouan Gaming Board number, ALSI-202410011-FI1, a status of valid, and a register link that is a validation query tied to the bc.game domain rather than a page on the operator's own website. Roobet's licence, OGL/2024/687/0427 from the Government of Curacao, carries no register link at all in our record.
Past the licence the comparison turns around. We hold no coin list, no studio list and no verification clause for BC.Game — those documents have not been read, which is a gap in our library rather than a claim about the brand. Roobet's cashier prints eleven coins and its terms number the charges.
The two licence records next to each other
A register link that takes a domain as its query is a link a reader can act on: it goes to the issuing board and asks about a specific website. Roobet's number is a 2024-series Curacao reference, and when it was put to the certificate register on 2026-08-28 it returned nothing. So did every other domain queried that day, which is why nothing is concluded from it here.
| Roobet | BC.Game | |
|---|---|---|
| Authority | Government of Curacao | Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros |
| Number | OGL/2024/687/0427 | ALSI-202410011-FI1 |
| Status in our record | Not stated | Valid |
| Register link | None held | Domain-tied validation query |
| Named operating company | Raw Entertainment B.V., reg. 157205 | Not read |
Roobet from its footer legal line and terms, read 2026-08-28. BC.Game from our operator record, checked 2026-08-27.
Where Roobet publishes and BC.Game's documents are unread
Roobet names two companies rather than one. Raw Entertainment B.V., registration 157205 at Korporaalweg 10 in Curacao, holds the licence; Raw Entertainment Ltd, registration HE421735 in Limassol, is the paying and operational agent, the entity money actually moves through. Our BC.Game record has no equivalent.
The same is true of the cashier. Roobet's lists eleven coins: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE. We have not read a coin list for BC.Game. On studios the position is more even — Roobet publishes no studio list either, and the sixty-four provider names we hold for it come from our own library rather than from anything Roobet prints.
Verification and the cost of moving money
Roobet's terms give it discretion rather than a number. Clause 4.9 lets it ask for documents at any time and restrict deposits and withdrawals until identification is complete; clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified. No figure is attached to either. We have not read a verification clause for BC.Game, so neither brand gives a reader a threshold to plan around.
Roobet does publish its charges. Clause 9.7 applies 1% to all successful fiat deposits; clause 10.8 applies 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in any rolling thirty-day period onwards; clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before withdrawal. Roobet publishes no maximum withdrawal, and we hold no cap for BC.Game — in both cases an absent document, not a promise of no limit.
Pros
- Licence number ALSI-202410011-FI1 comes with a register link that queries the bc.game domain directly.
- Licence status in our record reads valid, where Roobet's status field is empty.
- No wager-before-withdrawal rule of the kind Roobet sets out at clause 10.1 appears in anything we hold.
Cons
- No coin list read, so the cashier cannot be set against Roobet's published eleven.
- No studio list read, and no operating company or registration number recorded.
- No verification clause read at all, which is the single most useful document for a player deciding between the two.
Questions people ask
- Does BC.Game publish a verification threshold Roobet does not?
We have not read a verification clause for BC.Game, so we cannot say. Roobet's position is known: clauses 4.9 and 10.5 give it discretion to ask at any time and refuse withdrawals until identity is verified, with no figure attached.
- Which licence is easier to check?
BC.Game's. Its record carries an Anjouan number and a validation link that takes the domain as a query. Roobet's Curacao number OGL/2024/687/0427 has no register link in our record, and the certificate register returned no result for any domain queried on 2026-08-28.
- How many coins does each one take?
Roobet's cashier prints eleven: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE. We have not read a coin list for BC.Game.
- Does either publish a withdrawal cap?
Roobet publishes no maximum withdrawal in anything we read, and we hold no cap document for BC.Game. Neither absence should be read as a guarantee that no limit is applied.
BC.Game · alternatives to Roobet