Fairspin vs Roobet
Fairspin's studio roster is one of the largest here and its terms at least put a clock on document requests, but its licence number is shared with another brand and its cashier has not been read.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
Fairspin against Roobet, side by side
| Fairspin | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Anjouan Gaming Board | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | ALSI-202508047-FI2 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | valid | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | 114 | Not published |
| Coins | Not verified | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | Not published | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
Fairspin is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
Fairspin names one hundred and fourteen studios on its own pages, a roster beaten by only one other brand in this comparison. The list runs from Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Play'n GO, NetEnt and Nolimit City through to a long tail of smaller suppliers. Roobet names none. The sixty-four provider names our library holds for Roobet come from our own compilation and not from a page Roobet publishes, which is the distinction that matters when the question is what an operator will state.
On verification Fairspin's clause 7.6 allows it to request documents and information for a KYC check at its discretion, including when it is considering a refund request, and requires the player to supply them within five days. Roobet's clauses 4.9 and 10.5 allow requests at any time and refuse withdrawals until identity is fully verified, with no deadline in either direction and no figure attached.
A deadline on one side, open-ended discretion on the other
Five days is a short window, and it cuts both ways. It tells a player how long they have, which is more than Roobet's terms do; it also means a request arriving while someone is away can lapse. Roobet sets no period at all, so a request stays open indefinitely and a withdrawal stays blocked until it is answered.
Neither operator states an amount. Fairspin's clause is triggered at its discretion; Roobet's clause 4.9 is the same. The difference between them is procedural rather than substantive: one document describes a process with a timer, the other describes a power without one.
The licence number is not Fairspin's alone
Fairspin's Anjouan licence, ALSI-202508047-FI2, is recorded as valid with the register link pointing at the Anjouan Gaming Board's public licence register. The identical number appears on Weiss's record in this library. That is a master-licence structure — a single certificate under which more than one site operates — and it means the number on the footer identifies the licensing arrangement rather than this particular brand. It is weak evidence about how the two sites relate and it is not proof of common ownership.
| Roobet | Fairspin | |
|---|---|---|
| Studios named | None published | 114 |
| Coins listed | 11 | Not read |
| Document deadline | None stated | Five days, clause 7.6 |
| Licence | OGL/2024/687/0427, Curacao | ALSI-202508047-FI2, Anjouan |
| Licence number unique in our library | Yes | No, also on Weiss |
| Register link | None held | Anjouan public licence register |
Roobet read 2026-08-28. Fairspin from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.
Cashier and cost, where Roobet answers and Fairspin does not
Roobet's cashier is published: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE. We have not read a coin list for Fairspin, so a player cannot establish in advance what it accepts. For a player who would deposit in cryptocurrency, that is a gap worth weighing against the studio roster.
Roobet also publishes what it charges. Clause 9.7 applies 1% to all successful fiat deposits; clause 10.8 applies 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in any rolling thirty-day period and to each one after; clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before withdrawal. No fee schedule has been read for Fairspin, and no maximum withdrawal has been read for it either, while Roobet publishes none. Both blanks are unread or unpublished figures, not assurances.
Pros
- One hundred and fourteen studios named, among the largest published rosters in this set.
- Clause 7.6 gives a five-day period for supplying documents, where Roobet sets no period.
- Licence recorded as valid with a link to the Anjouan board's public register.
Cons
- The licence number ALSI-202508047-FI2 also appears on Weiss, so it is not specific to this site.
- Five days is a short window, and a missed request has consequences.
- No coin list, fee schedule, withdrawal cap or founding year read.
Questions people ask
- How long does Fairspin give you to send documents?
Clause 7.6 requires them within five days. Roobet's terms set no deadline, which means a request stays open and a withdrawal stays blocked until it is answered.
- Does Fairspin publish a verification threshold?
No. Its clause is triggered at the operator's discretion, as Roobet's clauses 4.9 and 10.5 are.
- Why does the shared licence number matter?
ALSI-202508047-FI2 also appears on Weiss's record. That indicates a master-licence structure covering more than one brand. It is weak evidence and never proof of shared ownership.
- Which coins does Fairspin accept?
We have not read a coin list for it. Roobet's cashier prints eleven.
- Which one names more game studios?
Fairspin, with one hundred and fourteen. Roobet publishes no studio list at all.
Fairspin · alternatives to Roobet