JacksClub vs Roobet
JacksClub's licence sits in an independent register where Roobet's number does not resolve, but on everything a player interacts with — coins, games, costs — Roobet is the only one of the two that has published anything.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
JacksClub against Roobet, side by side
| JacksClub | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Anjouan Gaming Board | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | ALSI-202507028-FI2 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | valid | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | Not verified | Not published |
| Coins | Not verified | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | Not published | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
JacksClub is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
This is a thin comparison, and saying so is more useful than dressing it up. For JacksClub our library holds a licence, a verification summary and nothing else: no coin list, no studio roster, no fee schedule, no withdrawal cap, no operating company and no founding year. Those documents have not been read. That is a limit on what we can tell a reader, not a finding about the operator.
The licence itself is the strongest thing on the record. JacksClub holds Anjouan number ALSI-202507028-FI2, recorded as valid, and the register reference points at the Anjouan Gaming Board's public licence register rather than at jacksclub.io. Roobet's Curacao number OGL/2024/687/0427 has no register link in our record, and the Curacao certificate register returned no result for it — or for any other domain queried — on 2026-08-28.
Two verification clauses that say almost the same thing
JacksClub's terms of service allow it to ask for KYC documentation at any time it deems necessary, to determine a user's identity and location, and to restrict service, payments or withdrawals until identity is sufficiently determined, at its sole discretion. Roobet's clause 4.9 allows documents to be requested at any time at its discretion and deposits and withdrawals to be limited until identification is complete; clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified.
The wording differs; the position does not. Both reserve open-ended discretion, both attach no figure, and both make withdrawal conditional on verification. A player moving from one to the other on the strength of the KYC clause alone would be moving sideways. Roobet's version has the small advantage of clause numbers a reader can cite; JacksClub's is a section of a terms page.
What Roobet publishes and our JacksClub record does not carry
Roobet's cashier lists eleven coins — BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE — and its terms carry three money clauses a player can price. Clause 9.7 applies a 1% fee to all successful fiat deposits. Clause 10.8 applies 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in any rolling thirty-day period and to each one after it. Clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn.
| Roobet | JacksClub | |
|---|---|---|
| Coins listed | 11 | Not read |
| Studios named | None published | Not read |
| Verification clause | 4.9 and 10.5, no figure | Terms of service, no figure |
| Withdrawal cap | Not published | Not read |
| Fee clauses | 9.7 and 10.8 | Not read |
| Licence status | Not stated | Valid |
Roobet read 2026-08-28. JacksClub from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.
Where the licence records genuinely differ
Anjouan's public register is a page maintained by the issuing board. A link to it is not the same as a link to the operator's own terms, which several brands in this comparison offer instead, and it is not the same as no link at all, which is Roobet's position. On this single measure JacksClub is ahead.
It is worth being careful about how much that proves. A licence held in a small jurisdiction, recorded as valid, tells a player which body would hear a complaint. It does not tell them how that body behaves, and it is not a substitute for the coin list, fee schedule and game roster our JacksClub record is missing. Roobet, for its part, names two companies with registration numbers — Raw Entertainment B.V., reg. 157205, and Raw Entertainment Ltd, reg. HE421735 in Limassol — which is more corporate detail than most brands here supply and more than we hold for JacksClub.
Pros
- Licence ALSI-202507028-FI2 recorded as valid, with a link into the Anjouan board's public register.
- The verification clause has been read and is quotable, which is not true of several brands in this set.
- No deposit fee equivalent to Roobet's clause 9.7 appears in anything we hold.
Cons
- No coin list read, so the cashier cannot be set beside Roobet's eleven.
- No studio list, fee schedule, withdrawal cap, operating company or founding year read.
- The verification clause is as open-ended as Roobet's, with no figure and no trigger.
Questions people ask
- What does JacksClub say about identity checks?
Its terms allow KYC documentation to be requested at any time it deems necessary, to determine identity and location, with service, payments or withdrawals restricted until identity is sufficiently determined.
- Is that different from Roobet?
Not materially. Roobet's clause 4.9 covers requests at any time and restrictions until identification completes, and clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified. Neither states an amount.
- Which coins does JacksClub take?
We have not read a coin list for it. Roobet's cashier prints eleven: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE.
- Is the licence checkable?
The reference goes to the Anjouan Gaming Board's public licence register, which is an independent page. Roobet's Curacao number carries no register link in our record.
- Does JacksClub charge fees on deposits or withdrawals?
No fee schedule has been read. Roobet publishes two charges: 1% on fiat deposits at clause 9.7 and 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in a rolling thirty days at clause 10.8.
JacksClub · alternatives to Roobet