Skip to content

Bitcasino.io vs Roobet

Bitcasino.io puts numbers where Roobet puts discretion — a verification point, a weekly ceiling and the largest studio roster in this set — but it shares its licence number with another brand and publishes no coin list we could read.

Written by /Last checked:

Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say

Bitcasino.io against Roobet, side by side

 Bitcasino.ioRoobet
LicenceCuraçao Gaming AuthorityGovernment of Curaçao
Licence no.OGL/2023/111/0069OGL/2024/687/0427
Register statusActiveNot checked in the register
Providers120Not published
CoinsNot verified11
Stated KYC thresholdEUR 2,500Not published
Withdrawal capUSDT 1,000,000Not published
SinceNot verifiedNot published

Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.

Bitcasino.io is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.

Bitcasino.io is one of the few operators in this comparison that answers the question players actually ask. Clause 6.6 of its terms says withdrawals above 2,500 euros or the equivalent in cryptocurrency may be subject to additional KYC checks, and that smaller withdrawals may also be checked as the gaming licence requires. Verification may be requested at any time, including on first deposit and before withdrawals are processed. Roobet's clauses 4.9 and 10.5 give the same discretion with no figure anywhere in them.

It also names one hundred and twenty studios, the largest roster of any brand in this set — Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Nolimit City, Hacksaw Gaming, NetEnt, Play'n GO, Novomatic and Microgaming among them. Roobet names none, and the sixty-four provider names our library holds for Roobet are our own compilation rather than a page Roobet publishes.

Numbers on one side, discretion on the other

The comparison here is unusually clean, because both operators wrote about the same subjects and only one of them used figures. Clause 6.10 of Bitcasino.io's terms also sets a maximum withdrawal of 1,000,000 USDT per week. That is a ceiling most accounts will never approach, but it is a stated ceiling, and Roobet publishes no maximum withdrawal at all — an absent field rather than an absence of limits.

Figures each operator publishes
RoobetBitcasino.io
Verification pointNone stated2,500 euros, clause 6.6
Withdrawal capNot published1,000,000 USDT per week, clause 6.10
Studios namedNone published120
Coins listed11Not read
Deposit fee1% on fiat, clause 9.7Not read
Licence statusNot statedActive

Roobet from its terms and cashier, read 2026-08-28. Bitcasino.io from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.

A licence number that is not unique to this brand

Bitcasino.io's Curacao Gaming Authority number, OGL/2023/111/0069, is recorded with a status of active and a certificate link into the authority's own register. That is a stronger reference than Roobet's OGL/2024/687/0427, which carries no register link and did not resolve when queried on 2026-08-28 — although no domain queried that day resolved, so nothing follows from the non-result.

The same number appears on another brand in this comparison, Livecasino.io. That is a master-licence structure: one certificate covering more than one site. It is weak evidence about how the brands relate to each other, and it is not proof of common ownership — the sensible reading is that a reader checking the certificate will find a document that is not specific to the site they are on. Roobet's number, whatever else can be said about it, appears on no other record in our library.

What Roobet still does better

Roobet publishes its cashier and Bitcasino.io does not. Eleven coins are printed: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE. We have not read a coin list for Bitcasino.io, so a player cannot tell in advance what they can deposit — which for a crypto casino is a strange thing to leave unsaid.

Roobet also names two companies with registration numbers: Raw Entertainment B.V., reg. 157205 at Korporaalweg 10 in Curacao as the licence holder, and Raw Entertainment Ltd, reg. HE421735 in Limassol as the paying and operational agent. We hold no company detail for Bitcasino.io. And Roobet's charges, while charges, are legible: 1% on fiat deposits at clause 9.7, 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in a rolling thirty days at clause 10.8, and a wagering requirement before withdrawal at clause 10.1. No fee schedule has been read for Bitcasino.io at all.

Pros

  • A stated verification point of 2,500 euros at clause 6.6, where Roobet states none.
  • One hundred and twenty studios named, the widest published roster in this comparison.
  • Active licence status with a certificate link into the Curacao register.
  • Clause 6.10 states a weekly withdrawal ceiling rather than leaving the field blank.

Cons

  • The licence number OGL/2023/111/0069 also appears on Livecasino.io, so the certificate is not specific to this site.
  • No coin list read, so the cashier cannot be compared with Roobet's eleven.
  • No fee schedule and no operating company read.

Open site

Questions people ask

At what point does Bitcasino.io ask for documents?

Clause 6.6 names 2,500 euros or the crypto equivalent as the level at which additional checks may apply, and says smaller withdrawals may also be checked. Verification may also be requested on first deposit. Roobet attaches no figure to anything.

Is there a withdrawal limit?

Clause 6.10 sets 1,000,000 USDT per week. Roobet publishes no maximum withdrawal, which means the figure is absent from its documents rather than known to be unlimited.

Why does the licence number matter here?

OGL/2023/111/0069 also appears on Livecasino.io's record. That is a master-licence structure covering more than one brand. It is weak evidence and not proof that the sites share an owner.

Which coins does Bitcasino.io accept?

We have not read a coin list for it. Roobet's cashier prints eleven: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE.

Which one names more game studios?

Bitcasino.io, with one hundred and twenty against none published by Roobet.

Bitcasino.io · alternatives to Roobet