Livecasino.io vs Roobet
Livecasino.io publishes the verification figure Roobet withholds, but it also admits to random account health checks, and its licence certificate is shared with another brand.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
Livecasino.io against Roobet, side by side
| Livecasino.io | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | OGL/2023/111/0069 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | Active | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | 50 | Not published |
| Coins | Not verified | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | EUR 2,500 | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
Livecasino.io is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
Clause 6.6 of Livecasino.io's terms is one of the more informative verification clauses in this comparison. KYC may be carried out at any time at the operator's discretion, including what the terms call random account health checks. Identity documents can be required on first deposit, before withdrawals are processed, and on any withdrawal above 2,500 euros or the cryptocurrency equivalent, as the gaming licence regulates.
Roobet publishes no figure of any kind. Clause 4.9 allows documents to be requested at any time and deposits and withdrawals to be limited until identification is complete; clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified. A reader gets the same open-ended power with none of the surrounding detail — no threshold, no named trigger, no description of when checks are run.
A figure, a first-deposit check and random reviews
The 2,500 euro line is useful and should not be oversold. The clause keeps discretion below it, adds the possibility of a check on first deposit, and describes random reviews on top — so the figure marks where checks become likely, not where they begin. Read in full it is a heavier regime than the number alone suggests.
Roobet's is lighter to read and no lighter in effect. Its two clauses reserve the same discretion and describe nothing about how it is exercised. Between an operator that documents an intrusive process and one that documents none, the first at least lets a player decide with their eyes open, and this comparison treats that as the point in Livecasino.io's favour.
Fifty studios against no studio list
Livecasino.io names fifty studios on its own pages, among them Evolution, Ezugi, Pragmatic Play Live, Play'n Go, NetEnt, Nolimit City, Bombay Live and Live Solutions — a roster weighted towards live dealer suppliers, which matches the brand's name. Roobet publishes no studio list at all.
| Roobet | Livecasino.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Verification figure | None stated | 2,500 euros, clause 6.6 |
| Studios named | None published | 50 |
| Coins listed | 11 | Not read |
| Licence number | OGL/2024/687/0427 | OGL/2023/111/0069 |
| Licence number unique in our library | Yes | No, also on Bitcasino.io |
| Register link | None held | Certificate link into the Curacao register |
Roobet read 2026-08-28 from its terms and cashier. Livecasino.io from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.
Pros
- A stated verification figure of 2,500 euros at clause 6.6, where Roobet states none.
- Fifty studios named, weighted towards live dealer suppliers.
- Active Curacao certificate with a register link, against no register link at Roobet.
Cons
- The same clause allows random account health checks and a check on first deposit.
- Licence number OGL/2023/111/0069 also appears on Bitcasino.io, so the certificate is not site-specific.
- No coin list, fee schedule, withdrawal cap or founding year read.
Questions people ask
- When does Livecasino.io ask for documents?
Clause 6.6 allows checks at any time, including random account health checks, on first deposit, before withdrawals are processed, and on withdrawals above 2,500 euros or the crypto equivalent.
- Does Roobet publish anything comparable?
No. Clauses 4.9 and 10.5 reserve the same discretion without stating a figure, a trigger or a process.
- Why does the licence number matter?
OGL/2023/111/0069 also appears on Bitcasino.io's record, which indicates a master-licence structure covering more than one brand. It is weak evidence and not proof of shared ownership.
- How many studios does each name?
Livecasino.io names fifty on its own site. Roobet names none; the sixty-four providers in our Roobet record come from our own library.
- Which coins does Livecasino.io take?
We have not read a coin list for it. Roobet publishes eleven coins in its cashier.
Livecasino.io · alternatives to Roobet