Sportsbet.io vs Roobet
Sportsbet.io publishes the verification figure Roobet withholds and names more than a hundred studios, but it publishes no coin list at all, which for a crypto site is an odd silence.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
Sportsbet.io against Roobet, side by side
| Sportsbet.io | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | OGL/2023/110/0072 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | Active | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | 110 | Not published |
| Coins | Not verified | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | EUR 2,500 | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
Sportsbet.io is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
Clause 6.6 of Sportsbet.io's general terms says additional identity verification may be carried out on withdrawals larger than 2,500 euros or the equivalent in cryptocurrency, and also on smaller withdrawals at the operator's discretion. It adds that KYC may be carried out generally and that an account may be blocked or closed if the data supplied is false or misleading. That is a stated figure, and stated figures are rare here.
Roobet gives none. Clause 4.9 permits documents to be requested at any time and deposits and withdrawals to be limited until identification is complete; clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified. On the question of when a check arrives, one operator has written a number and the other has not, and that is a real difference rather than a presentational one.
The figure, and how much certainty it buys
A published threshold is worth less than it first appears, and it is worth saying so. Sportsbet.io's clause keeps the discretion to check below the figure as well, so 2,500 euros is a level above which checks become likely rather than a level below which they cannot happen. It still tells a player something Roobet's documents never do: that a line exists and roughly where it sits.
Roobet's clauses are broader in the sense that they name no line at all. Whether that is worse in practice depends on conduct nobody here has measured. What can be said from the documents is that a reader of Sportsbet.io's terms can plan a withdrawal pattern around a number, and a reader of Roobet's cannot.
Games named, cashier unnamed
Sportsbet.io names one hundred and ten studios on its own pages — Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Play'n GO, Nolimit City, Hacksaw Gaming, NetEnt, Novomatic, Push Gaming and Yggdrasil among them. Roobet names none anywhere it publishes. Against that, Roobet's cashier is public and Sportsbet.io's has not been read, which leaves a player unable to check in advance what they can deposit.
| Roobet | Sportsbet.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Verification figure | None stated | 2,500 euros, clause 6.6 |
| Studios named | None published | 110 |
| Coins listed | 11 | Not read |
| Licence number | OGL/2024/687/0427 | OGL/2023/110/0072 |
| Licence status | Not stated | Active |
| Withdrawal cap | Not published | Not read |
Roobet read 2026-08-28. Sportsbet.io from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.
Licence trail and costs
Sportsbet.io's Curacao Gaming Authority number OGL/2023/110/0072 is recorded as active with a certificate link into the authority's own register, which is a stronger reference than Roobet's, where our record holds no register link at all. Roobet's number did not resolve when queried on 2026-08-28, but neither did any other domain queried that day, so the result carries no weight in either direction.
Roobet's charges remain the only quantified costs in this comparison. Clause 9.7 applies 1% to all successful fiat deposits. Clause 10.8 applies 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in a rolling thirty-day period and to every one after it. Clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn. No fee schedule has been read for Sportsbet.io, and no maximum withdrawal for either brand.
Roobet also names the companies behind it, with registration numbers for both — Raw Entertainment B.V., reg. 157205 in Curacao, and Raw Entertainment Ltd, reg. HE421735 in Limassol, described as the paying and operational agent. No equivalent corporate detail sits on our Sportsbet.io record.
Pros
- A stated verification figure of 2,500 euros at clause 6.6, where Roobet states none.
- One hundred and ten studios named on the operator's own site.
- Active Curacao certificate with a register link, against no register link at Roobet.
Cons
- No coin list read, so a player cannot check the cashier against Roobet's published eleven.
- The 2,500 euro figure does not prevent checks below it — discretion is retained.
- No fee schedule, withdrawal cap, founding year or operating company read.
Questions people ask
- What is Sportsbet.io's verification threshold?
Clause 6.6 names withdrawals above 2,500 euros or the crypto equivalent as the point at which additional checks may apply, while retaining discretion to check smaller withdrawals too.
- Does Roobet publish anything comparable?
No. Clauses 4.9 and 10.5 allow documents at any time and refuse withdrawals until identity is fully verified, with no amount stated anywhere.
- How many studios does each name?
Sportsbet.io names one hundred and ten on its own site. Roobet names none; the sixty-four providers in our record for Roobet are our own compilation.
- Which coins can you deposit at Sportsbet.io?
We have not read a coin list for it. Roobet publishes eleven: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE.
- Are there withdrawal fees at Sportsbet.io?
No fee schedule has been read. Roobet applies 1% to fiat deposits at clause 9.7 and 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in a rolling thirty days at clause 10.8.
Sportsbet.io · alternatives to Roobet