DuckDice vs Roobet
DuckDice's cashier reaches assets Roobet's does not and its studio roster is published, but its verification clause is as open-ended as Roobet's and asks for one thing more.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
DuckDice against Roobet, side by side
| DuckDice | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Anjouan Gaming Board | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | ALSI-202509013-FI1 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | valid | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | 19 | Not published |
| Coins | 10 | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | Not published | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
DuckDice is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
The most concrete difference between these two is in the cashier. DuckDice lists ten coins: BCH, BTC, DASH, ETH, LTC, SOL, TRX, USDT, XMR and XRP. Roobet lists eleven: BTC, USDT, USDC, ETH, SOL, SUI, BNB, XRP, TRX, LTC and DOGE. DuckDice reaches XMR, DASH and BCH, none of which appear on Roobet's list; Roobet reaches USDC, SUI, BNB and DOGE, none of which appear on DuckDice's.
On games the two are not comparable in the same way, because only one of them publishes a list. DuckDice names nineteen studios, including Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Nolimit City, BGaming and Endorphina. Roobet names none. Nineteen is a modest roster next to the eighty-plus some brands in this set publish, but a modest published list is more use to a reader than no list at all.
Cashier width and cashier reach
Counting coins is the least interesting way to compare two cashiers. What separates these two lists is reach: DuckDice's includes an asset built for private settlement and one older payment coin, while Roobet's includes the newer chains and the second major stablecoin. Which is better depends entirely on what a player already holds.
| Roobet | DuckDice | |
|---|---|---|
| Total coins listed | 11 | 10 |
| On this list only | USDC, SUI, BNB, DOGE | XMR, DASH, BCH |
| Studios named | None published | 19 |
| Licence | OGL/2024/687/0427, Curacao | ALSI-202509013-FI1, Anjouan |
| Register link | None held | Anjouan public licence register |
| Verification figure | None stated | None stated |
Roobet from its cashier and terms, read 2026-08-28. DuckDice from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.
Verification: identity, location and source of funds
DuckDice's terms, at the section covering verification, allow it to request KYC and anti-money-laundering documentation at any time and at its discretion, to determine a user's identity, location and source of funds. Source of funds is the heavier of those three: it is the request that asks a player to account for where money came from rather than simply who they are, and Roobet's clauses do not name it.
Roobet's clause 4.9 covers documents at any time, at its discretion, with deposits and withdrawals limited until identification completes; clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified. Neither operator states an amount. On the practical question, both answers are the same: it can happen whenever the operator decides, and there is no published trigger to plan around.
Licence records and the charges neither side matches
DuckDice's licence is Anjouan ALSI-202509013-FI1, recorded as valid, with the register link pointing at the Anjouan Gaming Board's public licence register — an independent reference rather than a page on duckdice.io. Roobet's OGL/2024/687/0427 carries no register link at all, and returned no result when queried on 2026-08-28, as did every other domain tried that day.
Roobet names the companies behind it, which DuckDice's record does not. Raw Entertainment B.V., registration 157205 at Korporaalweg 10 in Curacao, holds the licence; Raw Entertainment Ltd, registration HE421735 in Limassol, is the named paying and operational agent.
On charges only Roobet has published anything to compare. Clause 9.7 applies 1% to all successful fiat deposits; clause 10.8 applies 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in a rolling thirty-day period onwards; clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn. No fee schedule and no withdrawal cap have been read for DuckDice, and Roobet publishes no cap either.
Pros
- Lists XMR, DASH and BCH, none of which appear in Roobet's cashier.
- Nineteen studios named on the operator's own site, against none at Roobet.
- Licence ALSI-202509013-FI1 recorded as valid, with a link to the Anjouan board's public register.
Cons
- Verification covers source of funds as well as identity and location, and carries no stated trigger.
- Ten coins to Roobet's eleven, without USDC, SUI, BNB or DOGE.
- Nineteen studios is a small roster next to the largest in this set, and no fee schedule has been read.
Questions people ask
- Does DuckDice take Monero?
XMR appears on its published coin list, along with DASH and BCH. None of the three is on Roobet's eleven-coin cashier.
- What can DuckDice ask for?
Its terms allow KYC and AML documentation at any time at its discretion, to establish identity, location and source of funds. Roobet's clauses 4.9 and 10.5 cover identity without naming source of funds.
- Does either state when verification is triggered?
Neither does. No figure appears in DuckDice's verification section or in Roobet's clauses 4.9 and 10.5.
- How many game providers does each name?
DuckDice names nineteen. Roobet names none; the sixty-four providers we hold for it come from our own library rather than a Roobet page.
- Is there a withdrawal cap?
None has been read for DuckDice, and Roobet publishes no maximum withdrawal in anything read. Neither blank should be taken as a guarantee.
DuckDice · alternatives to Roobet