Windice vs Roobet
Windice publishes its game suppliers where Roobet publishes none, but its cashier is narrower, its verification clause is the same open discretion, and it states no figures anywhere.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
Windice against Roobet, side by side
| Windice | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Anjouan Gaming Board | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | ALSI-202411018-FI1 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | valid | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | 44 | Not published |
| Coins | 7 | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | Not published | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
Windice is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
Windice names forty-four studios on its own site, among them Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Play'n GO, Playtech, Hacksaw, NoLimit, Quickspin and Yggdrasil. Roobet names none at all. That is the clearest difference between the two records and the one a player can act on immediately, because a published roster can be checked against the games actually on the site.
The cashier runs the other way. Windice lists seven coins: BTC, ETH, LTC, BCH, XRP, BNB and USDT. Roobet lists eleven, and the only Windice coin absent from Roobet's list is BCH. A player holding USDC, SOL, SUI, TRX or DOGE has a home at Roobet and none at Windice on the evidence read.
Two clauses that reserve the same power
Windice's clause 15.1 allows it to request KYC documentation at any time, in its sole discretion, and to restrict service, payment or withdrawal until identity is sufficiently determined. No monetary threshold is specified; verification is discretionary throughout.
Roobet's clause 4.9 permits documents to be requested at any time at its discretion and deposits and withdrawals to be limited until identification is complete, and clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified. The two positions are functionally identical, and it would be misleading to present either as the lighter option. Roobet's is split across two clauses and reaches deposits explicitly; Windice's is one clause covering service, payment and withdrawal together.
Records side by side
Windice's licence is Anjouan ALSI-202411018-FI1, recorded as valid, with the register link pointing at the Anjouan Gaming Board's public register — an independent page rather than the operator's own site. Roobet's Curacao number carries no register link in our record.
| Roobet | Windice | |
|---|---|---|
| Coins listed | 11 | 7 |
| On this list only | USDC, SOL, SUI, TRX, DOGE | BCH |
| Studios named | None published | 44 |
| Verification clause | 4.9 and 10.5, no figure | 15.1, no figure |
| Licence | OGL/2024/687/0427, Curacao | ALSI-202411018-FI1, Anjouan |
| Register link | None held | Anjouan public licence register |
Roobet read 2026-08-28 from its terms and cashier. Windice from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.
Costs, caps and the rest of the record
Roobet publishes charges and Windice does not. Clause 9.7 applies a 1% fee to all successful fiat deposits. Clause 10.8 applies 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in any rolling thirty-day period and to every one after it. Clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn — a rule that matters more than its length suggests, because it removes the option of depositing and immediately withdrawing.
No fee schedule has been read for Windice, so it cannot be described as cheaper, only as unmeasured. Neither brand publishes a maximum withdrawal: Roobet's terms carry none and no cap document has been read for Windice. Neither publishes a founding year. Roobet names its licence holder and its Cyprus paying agent with registration numbers; we hold no company detail for Windice.
Pros
- Forty-four studios named on the operator's own site, against no studio list at Roobet.
- Anjouan licence recorded as valid with a link into the board's public register.
- Lists BCH, which Roobet's cashier does not carry.
Cons
- Seven coins against Roobet's eleven, without USDC, SOL, SUI, TRX or DOGE.
- Clause 15.1 reserves the same open discretion as Roobet's clauses, with no figure.
- No fee schedule, withdrawal cap, founding year or operating company read.
Questions people ask
- How many game studios does Windice name?
Forty-four on its own site, including Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Playtech and Play'n GO. Roobet names none.
- Does Windice publish a verification threshold?
No. Clause 15.1 allows requests at any time in its sole discretion, with no monetary threshold specified, which is the same position Roobet takes at clauses 4.9 and 10.5.
- Which cashier is wider?
Roobet's, at eleven coins to seven. Windice adds BCH; Roobet adds USDC, SOL, SUI, TRX and DOGE.
- Is Windice's licence checkable?
Its register link goes to the Anjouan Gaming Board's public licence register rather than to windice.io, which makes it an independent reference. Roobet's record has no register link.
- What does each one charge?
Only Roobet publishes charges: 1% on fiat deposits at clause 9.7 and 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in a rolling thirty days at clause 10.8. No fee schedule has been read for Windice.
Windice · alternatives to Roobet