Rakebit vs Roobet
Rakebit has the wider cashier and a newer licence record, but its own pages contradict each other on verification, and an operator that says two things is harder to plan around than one that says a single unwelcome thing clearly.
Written by Jordan Vela/Last checked:
Editor — reads operator documents and records what they say
Rakebit against Roobet, side by side
| Rakebit | Roobet | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Anjouan Gaming Board | Government of Curaçao |
| Licence no. | ALSI-202602030-FI2 | OGL/2024/687/0427 |
| Register status | valid | Not checked in the register |
| Providers | Not verified | Not published |
| Coins | 15 | 11 |
| Stated KYC threshold | Not published | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | 2024 | Not published |
Source: roobet.com, 2026-08-28.
Rakebit is one of the 41 Roobet alternatives compared here, each on its own published records.
Rakebit's cashier is wider than Roobet's. Fifteen coins are listed: BTC, ETH, SOL, LTC, USDT, USDC, XRP, TON, ADA, DOGE, BNB, DAI, LINK, XMR and ZEC. Roobet lists eleven, and four of Rakebit's — TON, DAI, LINK and the two privacy coins XMR and ZEC — have no equivalent at Roobet at all. On this measure the alternative wins clearly and there is no need to qualify it.
Verification is where Rakebit becomes harder to read. Its terms of use require KYC documents — an identity document, a selfie and proof of address — when a withdrawal is claimed for the first time, and allow verification at any time on fraud or anti-money-laundering grounds. Its KYC policy allows verification before a first deposit below 2,000 dollars if a payment provider requires it. And its homepage FAQ says standard withdrawals are processed without documents. Those statements do not sit together.
One operator with two positions, and one with a single position
A contradiction between a marketing page and a contract is not neutral, because only one of them is enforceable. If the terms require documents at the first withdrawal and the FAQ says they are not needed, the terms are what a player will meet when the money is in play. Rakebit's own record therefore has to be read at its strictest: expect the request at the first cash-out.
Roobet's position is worse in substance and better in form. Clause 4.9 lets it ask for documents at any time and limit deposits and withdrawals until identification is complete; clause 10.5 refuses withdrawals until identity is fully verified. That is broad discretion, and it is unpleasant reading, but no other Roobet page contradicts it. A reader knows what the answer is going to be.
Cashier, licence and dates
Rakebit's licence is Anjouan ALSI-202602030-FI2, recorded as valid, with the register link pointing at the Anjouan Gaming Board's public register. It is the most recently issued number in this comparison, and the brand publishes a founding year of 2024 where Roobet publishes none.
| Roobet | Rakebit | |
|---|---|---|
| Coins listed | 11 | 15 |
| On this list only | SUI | TON, DAI, LINK, XMR, ZEC |
| Year founded | Not published | 2024 |
| Licence | OGL/2024/687/0427, Curacao | ALSI-202602030-FI2, Anjouan |
| Register link | None held | Anjouan public licence register |
| Studios named | None published | Not read |
Roobet read 2026-08-28. Rakebit from our operator record, checked 2026-08-26.
The costs and limits neither record settles
Roobet publishes its charges and Rakebit does not. A 1% fee applies to all successful fiat deposits under clause 9.7. From the tenth fiat withdrawal in any rolling thirty-day period, clause 10.8 applies 2% to that withdrawal and to each subsequent one. Clause 10.1 requires a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn. No fee schedule has been read for Rakebit, so its costs are unknown rather than lower.
Neither brand publishes a maximum withdrawal. Roobet's is absent from its terms; Rakebit's terms of use are cited in our record as the withdrawal-limits source but carry no figure. Both blanks mean the same thing to a reader making a decision: there is no published ceiling to rely on, and no published assurance that none exists.
Neither names its game studios either. Rakebit's roster has not been read, and Roobet publishes none. The sixty-four provider names we hold for Roobet come from our library, not from a Roobet page, and that distinction is worth keeping in view whenever the two are compared on games.
Pros
- Fifteen coins listed, four more than Roobet, including TON, DAI, LINK, XMR and ZEC.
- A recently issued Anjouan licence recorded as valid, with a public register link.
- Publishes a founding year of 2024; Roobet publishes none.
- The KYC policy at least names the circumstances in which pre-deposit verification can apply.
Cons
- The terms of use and the homepage FAQ contradict each other on whether documents are needed for withdrawals.
- Documents are required at the first withdrawal under the terms, which is a defined trigger and a strict one.
- No studio list and no fee schedule read; the withdrawal-limits clause carries no figure.
Questions people ask
- Does Rakebit require documents to withdraw?
Its terms of use say KYC documents are required when claiming a withdrawal for the first time. Its homepage FAQ says standard withdrawals are processed without documents. The two statements conflict, and the terms are the enforceable document.
- How many coins does Rakebit take?
Fifteen: BTC, ETH, SOL, LTC, USDT, USDC, XRP, TON, ADA, DOGE, BNB, DAI, LINK, XMR and ZEC. Roobet lists eleven.
- Is Roobet clearer about verification?
Clearer, not lighter. Clauses 4.9 and 10.5 give Roobet discretion to request documents at any time and refuse withdrawals until identity is verified, and no other Roobet page says otherwise.
- Does either publish a withdrawal cap?
Neither. Roobet publishes no maximum withdrawal, and Rakebit's terms are cited as the limits source without a figure being recorded.
- What does Roobet charge that Rakebit might not?
Roobet applies 1% to fiat deposits at clause 9.7 and 2% from the tenth fiat withdrawal in a rolling thirty days at clause 10.8. No fee schedule has been read for Rakebit, so no comparison is possible.
Rakebit · alternatives to Roobet